Leno, Huckabee, Homeschooling and the Mighty, Mighty Union

3 01 2008

There’s talk among home education groups and individuals about endorsing and opposing certain candidates, so I hereby declare myself an individual homeschooler neither for nor against Mike Huckabee.

Last night, several competing ideas about free will, unity and individual self-determination came together. Cable news looked to Iowa while I watched Huckabee on Leno, despite the striking union barring his individual path, as the not-writing writers sang (in unison, natch):

Everywhere we go-o
People want to know-o
Who we ah-are,
So we tell them –
We are the Union, The mighty, mighty Union. . . .

Hang together or we’ll hang separately. Strength in numbers. Majority rule. School uniforms? — why not, everything else is already standardized, unionized, controlled, defined and delimited, including both working and not working, and where you can or cannot go, to do either one. Some free will.

. . .it’s not working, not for anybody – not the corporations and managers, the stockholders and Wall Street, not for the purgatory-bound “employees” and their families.

Work and change may be hell, but the lesson of the day seems to be there’s nothing heavenly about not working and not changing, either.

Meanwhile, in a galaxy far, far away, the same lesson is being taught at School.

Unions like public schools are supposedly “liberal” yet can hardly be said to respect the individual. Individuals are forbidden to deviate from the union’s will. And I don’t just mean it controls and disciplines its own members to the point of depriving real kids of mom or dad’s paycheck for the duration, maybe getting them fired altogether — the social pressure not to cross a picket line affects us all, as if it’s printed in America’s Unwritten Rules of the Cultural Road, right there next to Public School Taxes and Support Our Troops (neither of which honors the individual over the collective, either.)

Conservatives have their churches to control the faceless masses, of course.

And all persuasions have their political parties, with their obsessive message control and what they like to call “party discipline” even for their celebrity candidates. (Remember when Joe Lieberman was a good party soldier, and what happened to him when he wasn’t?)

So I haven’t been thinking or talking about prez candidates individually, trying to get to know them as individual personalities to choose among them, because it seems to me that false storyline is how we as supposedly self-governing individuals, supposedly reconstituting OUR government each election cycle, get snookered every time — out of our unity as one people AND our individual freedom not to be.


Actions

Information

10 responses

3 01 2008
Homeschoolers For Huckabee … NOT « Homeschoolers For …

[...] Ross at Cocking a Snook!: Leno, Huckabee, Homeschooling and the Mighty, Mighty Union An individual homeschooler neither for nor against Mike [...]

3 01 2008
JJ

It’s 9 pm. CNN is projecting Huckabee as the Iowa winner, and he was just quoted as saying this proves that “message matters.” I can’t see how, considering that pretty much this same authoritarian, collectivist message is everywhere now, just costumed variously in red or blue (see “Can We All Agree ‘Capitol Ministries’ Is Oxymoronic?”):

State lawmakers cheering for the official National Prayer Car was just entertainment for the masses, apparently not what’s happening in the political pits every day. And Illinois and Texas (states whose online homeschoolers tout their legal separation from Church and State as a model for us all) are next — your civil liberties and private family sovereignty are on deck for this Church-State chopping block in the public square, and it won’t be the dreaded charter school marketers swinging the axe. Could it be Christ himself ?

. . .PBS just ran a four-part series about the Mormon Church, how carefully and effectively it governs every aspect of its members’ lives in public and private, defining everything big from parenthood to scholarship and everything small from dress to allowable beverages. Forget Mitt Romney, this reminded me that both Glenn Beck and Harry Reid are Mormons shaping the public debate but who don’t talk about “it” because their church doesn’t want them to . . . I think we all have a lot more learning to do about Church and State these days, and we’ve been distracted for far too long with trifles.

The PBS site features a school lesson plan with links and printouts, on the theme of Church and State, from which I just learned that Illinois at least, might seek political salvation in Barack Obama —

These items come from Jews On First, whose motto is:
Jews responding to the Christian right –
because if Jews don’t speak out, they’ll think we don’t mind.

. . . democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. . .

This might be difficult for those who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, but in a pluralistic democracy, we have no choice. Politics involves compromise, the art of the possible. But religion does not allow for compromise. To base one’s life on such uncompromising commitments may be sublime; to base our policymaking on them would be dangerous.

In the months and years to come, I am hopeful we can bridge these gaps and overcome the prejudices each of us brings to this debate. I believe that Americans want this. No matter how religious they may or may not be, people are tired of seeing faith used as a tool to attack and divide.

Americans are looking for a deeper, fuller conversation about religion in this country. They might not change their positions on certain issues, but they are willing to listen and learn from those who are willing to speak in reasonable terms — those who know of the central and awesome place that God holds in the lives of so many, and who refuse to treat faith as simply another political issue with which to score points.

3 01 2008
Nance Confer

Americans are looking for a deeper, fuller conversation about religion in this country.

**

I’m not.

And even those Americans who are religious in some way may be like me in wishing they would all quit swinging their Bibles around and talk about actual programs they would work to support.

Nance

3 01 2008
JJ

FavD and I watched a 2007 HBO documentary this afternoon called “Friends of God: A Road Trip” — Haggard (pre-fall from grace) was featured with his creepy grin, talking about how hot Christian sex is, how the little woman climaxes every time (every DAY!) and on and on. The billboards they showed might’ve been the worst. We decided the “good news” must be that all the wackos have already been attracted, and this kind of corrupt and repressive white male patriarchy will start to attrit (is that a verb?) back down now?

3 01 2008
JJ

Oh dear.
Elizabeth and John Edwards just said this proves message matters too, since he was “outspent six-to-one but came in second.”

What message??!

3 01 2008
JJ

Ah – so it’s Huckabee on the right and Obama on the left. Bernstein just quoted a stirring Obama calling folks to make this a CRUSADE. A round of wacko Christianity for the house!

p.s. guess we need to put some faith in what’s upcoming Monday then?

Bipartisan Group Eyes Independent Bid
First, Main Candidates Urged To Plan ‘Unity’ Government

By David S. Broder
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 30, 2007; A04

New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, a potential independent candidate for president, has scheduled a meeting next week with a dozen leading Democrats and Republicans, who will join him in challenging the major-party contenders to spell out their plans for forming a “government of national unity” to end the gridlock in Washington.

. . .Conveners of the meeting include such prominent Democrats as former senators Sam Nunn (Ga.), Charles S. Robb (Va.) and David L. Boren (Okla.), and former presidential candidate Gary Hart. Republican organizers include Sen. Chuck Hagel (Neb.), former party chairman Bill Brock, former senator John Danforth (Mo.) and former New Jersey governor Christine Todd Whitman. . .

4 01 2008
NanceConfer

Along with having no faith in the standard sense, I have no faith that this bunch of pols will figure out how to bridge the major differences between the parties. If they were bridgeable, we wouldn’t be split into parties. We’d all agree not just that “message matters” — which, of course, it does — but on the way to deliver on the “message.”

But we don’t. And we won’t.

Nance

4 01 2008
JJ

Well, at least maybe then we can remain reasonably optimistic along with Jon, that it won’t matter too much either way? I have to cling to SOMETHING! :)

4 01 2008
NanceConfer

At least when Jon Stewart speaks, I get the sense he is just telling it as he sees it and is not trying to sell me something. Maybe we could have a big write-in vote? :)

Nance

3 09 2008
Real Vetting of Palin Underway and It’s Same Old McSame Old « Cocking A Snook!

[...] and blogged about it some at Culture Kitchen. The Unity ‘08 movement was about issues and reforming our governance processes, no names to take sides over, just a hope for better politics and….  I thought it was actually better NOT to have specific individuals clubbing each other into the [...]

Leave a comment