So here’s my question: What exactly is this? What do you call MadV’s project? It isn’t quite a documentary; it isn’t exactly a conversation or a commentary, either. It’s some curious mongrel form. And it would have been inconceivable before the Internet and cheap webcams—prohibitively expensive and difficult to pull off.
This is what’s so fascinating about online video culture. DIY tools for shooting, editing, and broadcasting video aren’t just changing who uses the medium. They’re changing how we use it. We’re developing a new language of video—forms that let us say different things and maybe even think in different ways.
Don’t miss this as you prepare for the New Year.
(Daniel Kurtzman edits the Political Humor page of About.com, part of The New York Times Company. He is author of the books “How to Win a Fight With a Conservative” and “How to Win a Fight With a Liberal.”)
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : Barack Obama, Bush, Change, civil rights, Cognitive Psychology, Congress, Constitution, Corporate Culture, Culture, Cynical Stuff, Discipline-behavior, Dominionists, Edwards, Environment, Ethics and Philosophy, Feminism, Hillary Clinton, Humor, Identity, John McCain, Language, Leadership, Liberal, Memes, Movies/TV, Partisan Politics, Election News/Commentary, Political Frames, Power of Story, Public Communication, Quotes, Religion, Sarah Palin, Separation of Church and State--the First Amendment, Strange Bedfellows, Taxes
. . .[and] the beauty of reason, too. Philosophy grows from religion as astronomy grew from astrology, chemistry from alchemy.
So sayeth Christopher Hitchens.
But as intelligent and reasonable as humans now may be, people the world over including our own American media when the cartoonish becomes scary enough, still pretend and defer to religious claims that divinity plays humanity like puppets in a scripted play, a play that casts most humans as unworthy and doomed no matter what.
Thus in the third millennium “there is no bigger subject than God” and religious leaders still can bully this modern world into abandoning it all — our hard-earned philosophy, science and reason — via their (heavenly or hellish?) weapons of mass destruction, from controlling education, information and economic progress, to genital mutilation and genocide, to the increasing threat of nuclear bombs.
Frisky cock of the snook to Lynn for this six-and-a-half-minute CNN video of Lou Dobbs and Christopher Hitchens talking about the danger of organized religion as politics and policy. The interview ends with Hitchens’ own citizenship journey as Thomas Jefferson’s biographer and finally becoming our “fellow American” on Thomas Jefferson’s birthday at Jefferson’s memorial in America’s capital, in the name of the First Amendment and the essential wall of separation Jefferson himself once imposed between church and state in Virginia.
Mortimer Adler’s definition of education was “the freeing discipline of wonder.” Religious education seems like an oxymoron then, unless we change our definition of religion, to match. Make it freeing rather than oppressive, wondrous rather than warlike, open to questions and new discovery and change. That was the thought when I wrote this:
Maybe human spirituality is evolving [for the next cultural era] as we discover and accept truths not through patriarchal personification and studying “authoritative” writings spelled out for our dutiful performance on demand, but through an “unschooled” direct [and democratic if you will] personal connection to each other, and to the universe as a system?
Read the rest of this entry »
Comments : 12 Comments »
Categories : Accountability, belief in gods, Change, civil rights, Cognitive Psychology, Constitution, Dominionists, Ethics and Philosophy, Evolved Homeschoolers, Family Values, Health, History, Human Networking, Institutions and Individuals, Intellectual and Academic Freedom, Literalism, Logic, Memes, Middle East, organizational behavior, Philosophy, Political Frames, Power of Story, Pregnancy, Propaganda, Reason, Religion, Research and Science, School versus Education, Separation of Church and State--the First Amendment, The South, War, What's In a Name?, Wonder
Our local health club just sent me this by email:
Do you ever wonder whether happy people have something that keeps them cheerful, chipper and able to see the good in everything? It turns out they do; they have happy friends.
New research from Harvard Medical School and the University of California suggests that happiness is influenced not only by the people you know, but by the people they know. The study shows that happiness spreads through social networks, sort of like a virus, meaning that your happiness could influence the happiness of someone you’ve never even met.
“We have known for a long time that there is a direct relationship between one person’s happiness and another’s,” says study co-author James H. Fowler, PhD, University of California. “But this study shows that indirect relationships also affect happiness. We found a statistical relationship not just between your happiness and your friends’ happiness, but between your happiness and your friends’ friends’ happiness.”
They concluded that the happiness of an immediate social contact increases an individual’s chances of becoming happy by 15 percent. The happiness of a second-degree contact, such as the spouse of a friend, increases the likeliness of becoming happy by 10 percent, and the happiness of a third-degree contact, or the friend of a friend of a friend, increases the likelihood of becoming happy by 6 percent.
Surround yourself with happy people, because happy friends can make you happy.
Not like I didn’t already know that just about everything, good or bad, spreads through social networks. 😉
(Remember the study about how fat people have fat friends??)
Comments : 3 Comments »
Categories : Culture, education, HARVARD, Health, Human Networking, Humor, Institutions and Individuals, Memes, Nature-nurture, Play, Power of Story, Public Communication, Research and Science, Thinking and Feeling